A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

Of the facts charged in the instant case, each assault against the victim E and F and the insult against the victim G was decided to dismiss the public prosecution due to the revocation of the public prosecution on September 22, 2020.

1. On April 25, 2020, at around 10:00, the Defendant: (a) sought “D” located in the Busan Eastdong-gu C market; (b) demanded the victim E and the victim F to verify CCTV; and (c) confirmed CCTV managed by the victims from the victims; and (d) confirmed that CCTV direction was toward the floor and whether or not it has been lost.

The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at around 14:00 on the same day, tried to find the victims at their will, take a bath, take sound, and take the goods, and was unable to avoid disturbance for about 10 minutes, such as being pushed the victims E in several times by hand and taking the arms of the victim F, who saw the victim E by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the restaurant business of victims by force.

2. On April 25, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 14:45, at the place indicated in paragraph (1); (b) the Defendant was asked to ask questions about the circumstances of the instant case from I and I and I would like to leave the arms around the face of the police officer at the Busan Dong-dong Police Station H District of Busan, who was called upon by the Defendant upon receiving a report of 112 that he would avoid disturbance as described in paragraph (1); and (c) the Defendant was trying to leave the arms around the face of the above police officer; (d) the slope G was fleep and blue G was flick and blue G was flick and blue G was flicked two times on two occasions, and she was flicked to work together with I who had been on slope G and adjacent to it.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by the police officer I and Assistant G.

3. The Defendant, who visited the market merchants and their visitors at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, was called out as above while complying with them.