logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2014.07.22 2014고단525
사기
Text

Defendant is each of the crimes of No. 1 and No. 1 and No. 2 of the 2014 Highest 525 of the Decision and No. 546 of the Decision.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 30, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment for fraud and 2 years of suspended execution in the Changwon District Court Msan Branch, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on May 8, 2014.

"2014 Highest 525"

1. At around 20:00 as of March 20, 2014, the Defendant was provided with the “E” gathering of “E” for the victim’s operation in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan-si, and the fact that the Defendant, despite having no intent or ability to pay liquor, etc., was active as if the Plaintiff were aware that the Plaintiff would pay liquor, etc., and was ordered to sell liquor to the victim, etc., and the Defendant was provided with the victim with a small liquor amounting to KRW 20,000 in total of the market price.

2. On June 3, 2014, around 21:55, the Defendant: (a) committed an act as if the Defendant had no intent or ability to pay liquor, etc.; and (b) was ordered to pay the price; (c) the Defendant received an order for food to the said victim; and (d) the Defendant received from the said victim a small liquor of KRW 20,000 in total amount of the market price; and (d) the Defendant received one and a drinking water.

"2014 Highest 546"

1. On March 8, 2014, around 15:30 on March 15:30, 2014, at the “H” restaurant operated by the victim GF located in the Haan-gun, Haan-gun, the Defendant: (a) was committed as if the Defendant had no intent or ability to pay liquor, etc.; and (b) was ordered by the victim as if the Defendant would pay liquor, etc.; (c) was ordered by the victim; and (d) was provided with kimchi luchi with an order of liquor

2. On April 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 20:45, at the “K” restaurant operated by the victim J in Ha, Hanam-gun, and (b) despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay liquor, etc., the Defendant was ordered by the victim as if he were to pay liquor, etc.; and (c) received soup, soup, 23,000 won in total at the market price from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or J;

1. G statements;

1. Investigation report (to attach simplified tax invoices);

1. Receipt of simple services:

arrow