Text
1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. The parties' assertion
A. The counterclaim, upon the request of the counterclaim Defendant, lent the amount of KRW 5 million on December 10, 2014, KRW 10 million on February 10, 2015, KRW 500,000 to the account of the counterclaim Defendant; KRW 500,000 on December 11, 2014, KRW 118,862 on December 15, 2014, to the account of the counterclaim Defendant; and KRW 350,000 on December 10, 200; and KRW 350,000 on December 118, 2014, by means of remitting the money to (Law) E, who represented the counterclaim Defendant, etc., in a lawsuit
B. On December 10, 2014, the counterclaim Defendant’s assertion that the amount remitted by the counterclaim, on the other hand, was remitted by mistake, shall be returned following the return to the next day. On February 10, 2015, the amount remitted on February 10, 2015, was partially remitted to the counterclaim Defendant at F’s request. The counterclaim Defendant did not have to bear an attorney’s fee for the settlement of accounts with the guarantor who guaranteed the F, etc., and did not request the counterclaim to lend money to the Plaintiff for the appointment of an attorney.
2. Determination
A. According to each of the statements and arguments in Eul evidence 3, Eul evidence 6-1, Eul evidence 8 through 10, and the whole purport of the pleadings, the counterclaim transferred KRW 500,000,000 to the account of the counterclaim defendant, and KRW 10,000,000 on February 10, 2015, the counterclaim defendant is the spouse of F, the counterclaim is the spouse of F, who is the spouse of F, and the counterclaim is the spouse of F, and the counterclaim defendant guarantees the repayment of the deposit deposit amount of the KPPD at the request of F, a de facto spouse, the counterclaim defendant guarantees the repayment of the deposit amount of the KPD., Eul filed a lawsuit against the counterclaim defendant and the counterclaim defendant, Daejeon District Court Decision 2014Ga108137,50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, and 15,000,015,000).
B. According to the evidence No. 14 of the Plaintiff’s claim on loans of KRW 5 million on December 10, 2014, the counterclaim Defendant: (a) transferred KRW 5 million to the Counterclaim Plaintiff; and (b) on December 11, 2014, the date following the date on which the Counterclaim Plaintiff remitted KRW 5 million.