(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.05.22 2014고정1156

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.05.22 2014고정1156

폭행

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 19:00 on July 2, 2014, the Defendant was punished by the victim and the Si expenses on the ground that the victim E (the age of 55) did not make another person make a speech that the victim E (the age of 55) is an internal relationship with the Defendant at the time of the front city of 19:00 on July 2, 2014.

In both hands, the victim committed assaulting the victim at least three times on the right side of the victim's right side with his/her breath by cutting down the breath of the victim's breath.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the petition of accusation (Evidence No. 23, Book of Evidence);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

4. Determination on the issues of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which bear litigation costs

1. The summary of the defendant's and his defense counsel's assertion is that the defendant did not kill the victim's bat, or when the victim was injured.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by this court comprehensively based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., (1) the victim made a statement from the defendant that he had flicked the flat and invaded the right eye from the defendant since the investigation agency (Evidence Nos. 13, 14, 2, 17, 33, 17, 33). The witness statement is consistent and concrete with the contents of the statement, and (2) the witness statement that the defendant had taken flick of the victim's flating, was consistent with the victim's statement (Evidence No. 55 of the evidence record, witness F, witness F's legal statement), in light of the relation with the victim, F, the defendant and the victim, there is no circumstance to deem that F had taken the risk of flating and used flating the victim's flat, and (3) the defendant did not have any flating flat, but it is against witness's witness's statement.

참조조문

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2015.11.18 2015노726

-수원지방법원 2017.08.11 2016노3841

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.15 2017노155

-전주지방법원 2018.03.29 2017노1718

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.11.29 2017고정711