logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.02.04 2015노377
상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) informed the victim who prevents the transport vehicle and removed him; and (c) did not assault the victim as stated in the judgment below.

2. The following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., the victim, as a substitute from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, has a fact that the defendant was removed from his car in order to remove him from his car.

statement, 2. At the site of the case

F Also, the defendant took one hand from the investigative agency to the court of the court below to remove the victim's hand, and the defendant took three times to remove the victim's hand.

In full view of the facts that the defendant made a statement, the defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that he used the victim's assault as stated in the judgment below, and the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow