logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2014.10.14 2014고단442
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A fine of two million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 02:00 on July 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) borrowed a two-lane road in front of the cafeteria, “satise dyke dyke dyke dyke dyke dyke dyke,” located in the territory of the Eup/Myeon located in the area of the frontwest-gun located in the area of the frontwest-gun, North Korea, and driven a motor vehicle volume.

At the time, the Defendant was unable to drive normally three diseases of beer due to the state of drinking alcohol concentration of 0.076 percent in a meeting with friendships.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, destroyed the center separation zone on the left-hand side of the moving direction by getting out of the lane due to the driver's seat of the vehicle under the influence of alcohol, and caused the damage of the center separation cost damaged thereby causing trouble and danger to normal vehicle traffic.

In order to ensure smooth traffic flow and safety of road traffic, drivers, etc. who have caused traffic accidents immediately stop the accident site and take necessary measures, but the defendant left the site without any measures.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the same time and time as in the preceding paragraph, and driven a car volume by clocking approximately one kilometer before the point of accident referred to in the preceding paragraph in front of the Jinsung apartment located in the Dondong-gun, the Donan-gun, the Donan-gun, the Donan-gun, the Donan-gun, via the restaurant, up to 0.076 percent of blood alcohol concentration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148, Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Article 148-2 (2) 3, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow