A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (or the injury) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (after the accident).

On June 7, 2018, the Defendant, while driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.125% at around 22:55, while driving the said vehicle at the speed of 0.125%, and driving the D-way in front of the original city at the seat of the front city, from the slope of the front city, he was negligent in driving the vehicle under the influence of alcohol while neglecting the duty of care to safely drive the vehicle under the influence of the front and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle while driving the vehicle while driving the vehicle at the direction of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Defendant: (a) by such occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim, such as brain, etc., in which there is no wound in the two cases requiring a medical treatment for about three weeks; (b) injury to the victim G (hereinafter 23 years old), who is a passenger of the affected vehicle, such as crums and tensions, which requires a medical treatment for about three weeks; and (c) injury to the victim H (22 years old) who is another passenger, such as crums and tensions, which require a medical treatment for about three weeks; and (d) at the same time, the victim H (22 years old) suffered injury, such as crums and tensions, which require a medical treatment for about 6,935,247 hours in total, while destroying the damaged vehicle, and escaped without immediately stopping it.

2. On June 7, 2018, at around 22:55, the Defendant driven a car with approximately 3km section from the southwest-dong to the front side of the original city at the time of the original city at the time of the driving of the C Drita (the charges in the indictment are stated as “F Spoland, but are corrected ex officio as they seem to be a clear clerical error) while under the influence of alcohol at about 0.125% of alcohol level during blood.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E, G and H;

1. A survey report, an accident scene photograph, notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving, a seizure report;