1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: "C." "C." "C." "C." "C." "D." "E." "E." and "C." "E." "E." among the grounds of the judgment of the first instance.

In addition to adding Paragraph 4 as follows, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. As such, Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act accept it as it is. (c) The Plaintiff operated the instant CT in violation of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, such as the Rules on the Operation of Special Medical Equipment, etc., and thus, even if the expenses are actually incurred in shooting and diagnosis using the instant CT, it cannot be claimed as a medical care benefit cost. Article 57(5) of the National Health Insurance Act provides that “Where a medical care institution receives medical care benefit costs from a policyholder or dependent by deceit or other wrongful means, the Defendant shall collect them from the relevant medical care institution and pay them without delay to the policyholder or dependent.” Thus, it

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.