The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of suspended execution for one year of imprisonment, two years of probation, and two hundred hours of community service) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the favorable circumstances such as the fact that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes, the fact that the Defendant is against the recognition of all the instant crimes, and the period of operation of the game room is relatively short, the crime related to the illegal game room is highly harmful to society by encouraging the citizens’ excessive speculative spirit and hindering sound labor, etc., and the Defendant already committed the instant crime even though he had been punished twice as the same crime, and the Defendant committed the instant crime in spite of the fact that he had been directly operated of the instant game room, etc., the nature of such crime is inappropriate.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and various factors of sentencing indicated in the record, such as circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.