logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.05.31 2017고정318
모욕등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the fine shall be respectively imposed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants retired from the company operated by Defendant A by the victim C, and accused the victims at the branch office of the Gyeonggi-gu branch office of the Gyeonggi-gu Labor Office which is located in the head office of Suwon-gu as a wage problem, and visited the above branch office of the sports on August 12, 2016.

1. Defendant B

A. On August 12, 2016, the Defendant insultd the victim from among other civil petitioners at the waiting room of the above sports branch office around 13:00 on August 12, 2016.

1.111.11

No brain is abnormal, and he/she shall do so like a dykeer.

D. The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to “no less than a wirst year.”

B. At the time and place specified in paragraph 1(a), the Defendant would interfere with the victim’s “The employees are removed from the monthly salary of the employee, and the ex-post employees are removed from the eating house, and the Defendant would go to the company.”

The retirement allowance that he/she intends to see as well as to drink at the time of a year;

If the retirement is complete, a complaint shall be filed with the competent Labor Agency to cause a food;

(b) Doz., Doz., Do.,

N. N. N. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H.

D. D. D. L.S. W. L.W. L.W. L.W. L.S.C.

(b) The term “nicking off the four faces of the sexual intercourses”, etc., and the victim threatened the victim to the effect that he/she would know about the victim’s company and the church accompanying the victim as he/she was removed from the monthly salary of his/her employees.

2. Defendant A

A. In the case where there are other civil petitioners at the time and place of paragraph 1(a), the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by saying, “I will be the Dominar Doar Doar Doar Doar Doar Doar.”

B. The Defendant would make intimidation to the victim at the time and place of paragraph 1(a).

The entity shall be the entity of the fake entity

(c) the NAF should call out the substance that the NAVs are not the Doner and that they are the Doner.

1. Dol. Dol.

arrow