Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 7, 2017, at around 22:20 on June 7, 2017, the Defendant damaged property: (a) was placed on the outer wall of the second floor of the building adjacent to the building of the next apartment building of Yansan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

By breaking three air conditioners outside the air conditioner room, the victim E’s market price is 3.4 million won of the air conditioner room and the ship in its main body, the victim F’s market price is 3.0 million won of the air conditioner room and the ship outside the air conditioner room and the ship in its main body, the victim’s G’s market price is 2.4 million won of the air conditioner room and the ship outside the air conditioner, and the victim’s G’s market price is 2.4 million won of the air conditioner, respectively.

2. The Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at around 22:40 on the same day, and at around 22:40 on the same day, attempted to escape from a defect in order to check the Defendant by the police officer I and the police officer J to check the Defendant by the police officer I and the police officer of the Hansan Police Station He called out after receiving a report of 112 at the above place, and attempted to arrest the Defendant in front of the first apartment unit 102 unit of the 102 unit of the same head of the Hansan Police Station of the Hansan Police Station of the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each statement in the police statement protocol with respect to F, E, I, K, and G;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes in a medical certificate of injury and each investigation report (verification of the market price of damaged goods, victims and telephone calls);

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. There is no reason to commit a crime of obstructing the execution of official duties without stating the amount of damage caused by the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

However, the defendant was the first offender and agreed with the victims of the crime of damage due to the university students of 22 years of age, and the damaged police officers also want to take the action against the defendant.

Defendant.