logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.01.24 2017고단1091
상법위반등
Text

On the charge of the violation of the Commercial Code, the violation of the public electronic records, and the violation of the Commercial Code in the judgment of the defendant, and the violation of the public electronic records.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) appears to be a C whose indictment was suspended by being appointed by the Party Administration as a crime of re-use of electronic records, etc.; (b) however, the Defendant’s memory as to whether it is C is not clear; (c) the Defendant was present prior to the investigation, and (d) was offered to the effect that “I would pay money when I would create a floating company,” one by means of the most payment of the stock price, etc.; and (c) opened a passbook in the name of the juristic person, and had the passbook transferred the passbook to B to obtain profits therefrom.

2. Criminal facts;

A. (1) On June 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the same village of Daegu Bank located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) deposited 5 million won of the temporary loan from B into the account in the name of the Defendant under the name of the Defendant, and issued a certificate of custody of the shares from the said bank; (c) on June 27, 2016, the Daegu District Court prepared documents necessary for the registration of incorporation of D, including the application for registration of incorporation of D, stating as the Defendant’s resident registration, seal impression, etc.; (d) submitted to the public official in charge of the said entry and preservation of the said application in the electronic information system for registration of the corporation, which is an electronic record, and deposited 5 million won in the said register; and (d) immediately deposited the shares under the name of the said bank.

As above, the Defendant pretended to pay 5 million won for the share capital, and even though there was no fact that the corporation D was established, the Defendant filed a false report with respect to the public official, thereby allowing the public official to record the false fact in the register of the corporation, which is an electronic record, and exercised the same.

Shed F-related crimes, Inc.

arrow