All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. On October 15, 2014, at the entrance of the Cheongju-gu E apartment house, a considerable amount of time around 11:10, Defendant B found the victim on the ground that he was excluded from the candidate through the candidate qualification examination at the meeting of this Election Management Committee meeting of the victim A (79 years), the Chairperson of the Election Management Committee, who was registered as the candidate for the representative, even though he was registered as the candidate for the representative, and was found to have taken advantage of the fact that he was excluded from the candidate.

“In the course of coming to the above E apartment management office along with the victim, the victim suffered bodily injury on the left chest part of the victim by considering the victim’s blue and blue part of the victim’s chest with 4 to 6 times due to the victim’s blue and blue blue.”

B. Defendant A had the face of the Victim B (63) one time with the left hand at the same time and place as the above paragraph A, and had a part of the Victim B (63) one time to drink, and had the victim take care of about about 14 days, and had the part of the Victim B (63) on the part of the Plaintiff, and had the part of the Victim B (14 days to undergo treatment.

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A (i) At the time of misunderstanding the fact, the Defendant was moving to the management office upon receiving a claim from the victim B on the fact that he was excluded from the person who registered the candidate for the representative of the apartment, but the victim was faced with his face and chest due to his hand floor and the elbow, and immediately avoided his body into the management office.

The circumstances are the same, and the defendant did not inflict any injury upon the victim as stated in this part of the facts charged.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that found this part of the facts charged as it is is erroneous and adversely affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The punishment sentenced by the court below (one million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

B. At the time of the misunderstanding of Defendant B, the Defendant excluded the victim A from the person who registered the same representative candidate for the apartment.