1. The Plaintiff:

A. The Defendants deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. The Defendants are individually 3,760,000 won.

1. Indication of claim;

A. On February 12, 2013, the Plaintiff leased, to the Defendants, real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant officetel”) by setting the deposit of KRW 3 million, KRW 520,000 per month of rent, and the period of February 13, 2014, as indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant officetel”), as the period of February 13, 2014.

B. The Defendants did not pay for the nine-month rent of KRW 4,680,000 (=520,000 x 9 months).

C. On September 13, 2014, the Plaintiff’s termination of a lease agreement on the grounds of a rent-free delay.

D. The Defendants, even after the termination, occupy the instant officetel without delivering it to the Plaintiff, and thereafter, unjust enrichment (the total amount of the rent for delay and the unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent for delay shall be KRW 6,760,000) equivalent to the rent is reasonable.

E. Defendant C unpaid management expenses of KRW 379,720 as of February 10, 2015, and the Plaintiff paid overdue management expenses on behalf of the Plaintiff.

F. Accordingly, the Plaintiff sought against the Defendants the payment of KRW 3,760,000 remaining after deducting the overdue rent and unjust enrichment equivalent to the overdue rent from the deposit money of KRW 3 million. The Plaintiff sought payment of KRW 379,720 for Defendant C.

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).