All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

. H’s statement that the complaint was lodged is persuasive, and it is difficult to deem that the victim C prepared the instant document solely on the sole basis as alleged by the Defendant.

Among the documents of this case, the following circumstances revealed in the court below's judgment as to the authenticity of the remaining documents except for the cash custody certificate and the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, i.e., ① the documents of this case are not admitted as the authenticity in the established related civil procedure and thus denied the admissibility of evidence; ② H consistently states to the effect that "the victim C does not have any such documents." As seen earlier, the victim C's statement is reasonable and reliable rather than the defendant's assertion; ③ The victim C's registration number stated in the deposit ledger of June 30, 2008 is different from "Y", ④ The victim C's registration number stated in the deposit ledger of June 25, 2008, ④ the victim's registration number stated in the deposit certificate of June 30, 2008, and "TFR-GV 2C*4S Q" stated in the deposit certificate of this case, and the victim's statement submitted in the appellate court's first document of this case cannot be seen to have been proved as evidence.

(A) The Defendant appears to have asserted that the Defendant may not believe the H’s statement on whether the statement was made in Chapter 3 of the transaction statement submitted in the relevant civil procedure, and on the process of issuing the transaction statement to L. However, the above transaction statement is deemed as evidence and is not directly related to the facts charged in this case, as it does not fall under the documents of this case). In conclusion, the above transaction statement is concluded.