1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as Chigh School Teachers on September 1, 1989. From March 1, 2003 to February 28, 2013, the Plaintiff served as D School Teachers, and as E High School Teachers from March 1, 2013 to February 28, 2013.

B. On June 3, 2013, the Defendant requested the General Disciplinary Committee of Public Educational Officials B to make a resolution on heavy disciplinary action against the Plaintiff and disciplinary surcharge three times, and on July 26, 2013, on the ground that the Plaintiff committed the following misconduct (hereinafter “instant misconduct”) in accordance with the resolution of the said Disciplinary Committee, and that the Plaintiff violated Articles 56 (Duty of Good Faith), 61 (Duty of Integrity), and 63 (Duty of Integrity) of the State Public Officials Act, the Defendant issued a dismissal disposition and imposition of disciplinary surcharge (10 million won) pursuant to Articles 78 and 78-2 of the State Public Officials Act against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Articles 56 (Duty of Integrity), 61 (Duty of Integrity) and 63 (Duty of Integrity) of the State Public Officials Act.

(In total of the above two dispositions, hereinafter referred to as “instant dispositions”). When applying for an open screening examination for educational service specialized, the Plaintiff shall not apply for the examination by unlawful means.

During the period from the end of June 2012 to the beginning of July 2012, the Plaintiff was proposed to pay contributions for the development of education by telephone from the school affairs G of the F Office of Education on several occasions.

Although the plaintiff knew that it is not a contribution to the development of education, the plaintiff accepted the contribution at the beginning of July 2012.

On July 2012, the Plaintiff delivered KRW 10 million to G at the lower-level parking lot of the Central Library of H University.

On July 10, 2012, the Plaintiff provided an explanation through telephone about the examination for the examination for the examination for the examination for the examination for the examination for the examination for the examination for the examination for the examination for the examination for the examination of the examination for the examination for the examination of the examination for the examination of the examination for the first technical knowledge. On July 26, 2012, the Plaintiff provided an explanation about the three questions concerning the examination for the examination for the examination at the examination for the examination for the examination of the first technical knowledge, and on July 26, 2012, the Plaintiff received an explanation about

As a result, the plaintiff has taken the general screening test for life guidance in the field of education professionals I, I and I, and finally.