A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 30, 2014, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) around 22:35, the victim E of the victim E, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 report that a drunk person flassing a trial fee; (b) the victim E, who was in the Seoul Central Franc Police Station, flading him of the noise, she spits it, flads it, and she would have died; and (c) the victim E, who was present at the back of the vehicle without any justifiable reason, she spits it, flads it by voluntarily accompanying the police station to the police station, she takes a bath to the victim E, who was present at the front seat of the vehicle, with the victim’s flab, dumbing it with a blaf, blafing it, and blaf with the victim’s flaf, etc., with approximately 20 days of treatment.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate performance of official duties by police officers, and at the same time injured the victim E.

2. On July 30, 2014, around 22:50 on July 30, 2014, the Defendant damaged public goods by taking aboard the F patrol box No. 21, a patrol boat No. 21, at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) of the same Article, and then, without any reason, damaged public goods of approximately KRW 44,00 at the market price by removing the front stop of a vehicle with a driver’s license, without any reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A criminal investigation report;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Articles 257 (1), 136 (1), and 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the ordinary concurrent crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is not good, the fact that the defendant has lived in good faith without any previous conviction, reflects depth, and deposited two million won for damaged police officers, and other crimes are committed by the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, and family relationship.