A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is dismissed on June 30, 2015 from office as the Director General of the Editorial Bureau of an incorporated association C (Comprehensive Internet Publication Newspapers).

On September 17, 2014, the Defendant was accompanied by G, a representative of the residents of the building of the Nam-gu Incheon, Nam-gu D and E, to a contract site for the construction work of the building of the Fund with I and I operated by the victim H, on the ground that the Defendant was the chairperson of the reconstruction promotion committee of the F lending in Seoul.

As a result, the Defendant provided that the above victim is a member of the above C and a person with access to Incheon City, and received money as if he would resolve various civil petitions related to construction works at the request of the above victim, and instead did not receive money, the Defendant provided a civil petition related to the construction site.

By intimidation, money was received.

1. On October 7, 2014, the Defendant found the Defendant at the International Office Co., Ltd. No. 18, 7 Dong-dong, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (JJ No. 10:00) around October 7, 2014, on the issue of issuing a certificate of reporting flying dust generation necessary for the victim H and the Corporation.

During that, the defendant is well aware of the victim's "the inside of the city of Incheon, the director general of the bureau C, and the public officials of the South Dong-gu Office.

1.0,000,000 won was determined by the public officials of the South-Myeon-dong Office to resolve the problem of reporting fugitive dust necessary for construction.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not want to have access to Incheon City viewing and did not wish to use it individually. At the above construction site, the Defendant had already received a certificate of reporting on fugitive dust generating business. As such, the Defendant had no choice but to recover the said certificate after receiving a written waiver of the construction work. Therefore, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to resolve the said problem even if receiving money.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 1 million won from the injured party, i.e., the defendant.

2. Suppression;

A. The Defendant on October 2014