Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay a fine, only 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an employee of the F's main store located in Busan Dong-gu E, and Defendant B is the owner of the above main store.

1. No one shall sell, lend, or distribute to juveniles drugs, etc. harmful to juveniles;

Nevertheless, around 04:50 on August 29, 2015, the Defendant sold the instant “F” main points of “F” to G having come to customers and H(16 years of age), a juvenile accompanied by I (17 years of age) and the instant “I” (17 years of age) of juvenile drugs.

2. Defendant A, an employee of Defendant B, sold drugs harmful to juveniles to juveniles as described in paragraph (1) with respect to the Defendant’s work.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. The witness I, H, J and G respective legal statements, and some of the witness K's legal statements;

1. A report on detection of business places violating laws and regulations and on control of business places;

1. A copy of the work log;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Receipts:

1. Application of statutes on business licenses;

1. Article 59 Subparag. 6 and Article 28(1) of the Juvenile Protection Act; Defendant A who selects a fine: Articles 62 and 59 Subparag. 6 and Article 28(1) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the Provisional Payment Order: The Defendants and their defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendants and their defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserted that the crime of this case cannot be punished as coercion under Article 12 of the Criminal Act. However, as alleged by the Defendants, a single person called “L” who entered the juvenile and entered the main place, as alleged by the Defendants, sells alcohol.

The report was made to the police after the request was made to the police.

However, in light of the circumstances and circumstances at the time of the instant crime committed by the Defendants, which were duly adopted and investigated by the court, the Defendants’ act of this case would be threatening to inflict any imprisonent violence, life, and body injury.