1. The Defendants jointly share the amount of KRW 23,250,000 to Plaintiff B, as well as the amount thereof, from March 27, 2016 to November 15, 2019.

1. The construction work in this case on the basis of the facts;

A. Defendant C Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Defendant C”) contracted for E Corporation on March 22, 2016, and subcontracted the removal of the said construction work (hereinafter “instant construction”) to Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”) on March 25, 2016.

B. On March 7, 2016, Defendant D leased the Flateral (hereinafter “instant accusation work vehicle”) owned by Plaintiff A, who runs the business of leasing vehicles for accusation work, and the operation of the instant accusation work vehicle was decided by G, who is an employee of Plaintiff A.

In the event of the occurrence of the accident

C. On March 27, 2016, H, an employee of Defendant D, loaded waste concrete removed from the 7th floor of the instant complaint work vehicle, which was set up in the complaint work unit of the instant building operated by G to carry out the removal of the 7th floor of the building of the International University Life Science Sub-building, on the ground that the decline connecting the complaint work unit with the boom boom was cut, and died on the ground of a multi-scoping frame and a booming down the floor below approximately approximately 29 meters, etc.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

The maximum amount of the complaint work unit of the instant complaint work unit is 300 km, and the weight of waste concrete loaded in the complaint work unit was about 2,380 km at the time of the instant accident.

E. After the instant accident, the instant complainant stated that the investigative agency was in the state of the failure to install the said control tower device, and that the Plaintiff Company G was in the state of the malfunction of the control tower device due to the malfunction of the control tower device. After the instant accident, the instant vehicle driver G stated that the control tower device was frequently installed.

F. Regarding the occurrence of the instant accident, the Defendant C representative director J, Defendant D representative director K, Defendant C, Defendant D, Plaintiff A and drivers G are the Gwangju District Court due to the violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act and occupational injury, etc.