Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a substantial operator of B (the representative director: the defendant's wife C) and the defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of wholesale and retail business of so-called detention office supplies from Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D and the third floor.

1. In the event that Defendant A sells at least 10,00 ices to the same seller on the same day in accordance with the “Emergency Demand and Supply Adjustment Measures for Esck and hand-free disinfection,” Defendant A’s seller must report this to the Minister of Food and Drug Safety by no later than 12th day following the following day.

Nevertheless, the defendant from February 14, 2020 to the point of view

2. By the end of February 28, 200, 124,000 Mack for health in Co., Ltd. (F) purchased 1,600 won per unit, 20,000 G Co., Ltd. (20,000 won per unit), 20,000 H on February 17, 2020 (1,700 won per unit), 20,000 H on February 20, 200 (1,70 won per unit), 10,000 won (2,000 won per unit), 10,000 won per unit to G Co., Ltd. on February 28, 2020 (2,000 won per unit), 50,000 won per unit, and did not sell them to the Director by the end of February 17, 2020 (2,00 won per unit), and each of the following drugs was sold to the Director by the end of February 1, 201.

2. Defendant B’s actual operator, Defendant B, committed an act of violation as described in paragraph 1 in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the defendant A;

1. Each police statement made to F and I;

1. Business registration certificate, electronic tax invoice, transaction details;

1. A certificate of all the registered matters (stock company B);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for internal investigation and investigation reports;

1. Article 25(1) and Article 6(1)(2) of the Commodity Price Stabilization Act (Optional to a penalty) Defendant B: Articles 30, 25(1) and 6(1) of the Act on Price Stabilization; Articles 30, 25(1) and 6(1) of the same Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows.