logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.06.21 2017고단437
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is also a person who is engaged in driving a C car.

1. On January 25, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) led to the following two-lanes: (a) a five-lane road of the G dry-pack F at the time of light lighting from January 18:25, 2017: (b) a two-lane distance from the luminous boundary to the ridge.

At the same time, there are vehicles waiting for signal signal in front of the moving direction, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front left and right, and by accurately manipulating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and negligently driven a vehicle while waiting for the signal in front of the running direction of the Defendant (the age of 36) and received the back portion of the passenger vehicle of the 1st century, which was driven by the victim H (the age of 36).

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence the injury of the victim J(J, 38 years old), and the victim K(10 years old) of the passenger of the victim H and the passenger of the above low-class passenger car, the injury of the scopical base that requires approximately two weeks of treatment, the victim L(10 years old) and the victim M(10 years old) suffered from the injury of the scopical base, etc. which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driving a vehicle C in the state of alcohol alcohol 0.086% from the 3km section of approximately 3km to the place indicated in paragraph 1 from the front of a mutually influent restaurant located in the Gidae-si, Gidong at the time of lightlight-si on the day specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A H statement;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2 (2) 3 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving under influence of alcohol);

1.Article 40 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade.

arrow