logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.06.05 2014구단53219
국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 17, 1981, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on January 19, 1983 on the part of November 11, 1983 due to the TNT breadth accident, and received treatment on the part of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and the Ministry of Health and Welfare on the part of the Plaintiff.

B. On January 2002, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State, recognized the requirements of a person of distinguished service to the State as a deceased person, such as a deceased person’s fluoral and anti-moral moral moral mar and anti-moral moral moral moral mar. On July 30, 2002, a physical examination on October 30, 2002, and a follow-up physical examination on October 30, 2002, but was determined below the grading criteria. On June 29, 2012, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State, but was determined below the grading criteria, on February 28, 2013.

C. On May 27, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State again, and on October 31, 2013, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement recognized that a soldier or policeman was wounded in line with the requirements for soldier or policeman on duty (hereinafter “the instant wound”). However, on November 27, 2013, the “multi-scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic s (s)”

Accordingly, on March 12, 2014, the Defendant issued a notice to the Plaintiff that it would be decided to be ineligible for the application of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Class A evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The instant disposition is lawful.

arrow