logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.04.07 2014고단1492
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 19, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Jeonju District Court on September 19, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Suwon Detention Center on November 19, 2012.

As the representative of F Co., Ltd. for the purpose of apartment sale agency business, the Defendant is a person delegated by H Co., Ltd. for the execution of the project for the redevelopment of the Busan-gu G Commercial Building in Busan-gu, and the victim I is a lessee who entered into a lease contract for 108 stores in the above redevelopment commercial building.

The Defendant borrowed money from the J to request the actual operator of the HH Co., Ltd. to lend money from the J, and transferred it to the NA only to some of the money, and the remaining money to be used for personal purposes.

On July 2013, the Defendant should include the victim’s money in the LAD Office where the damaged party under the 109 unit of the K-T building in Busan Metropolitan City is working at the end of the day of July, 2013 in the executor’s account.

The store that the contract was entered into by the party is a good place, and the contract was not a "prudent" but a "prudent" so that it is required to do so.

The loan of KRW 100 million shall be refunded after two months.

The term "" means, on August 9, 2013, the victim's telephone to receive money from the implementing company to the account of the event at the time, and if it is sent money to the internal account, it is intended to deliver money to the executor.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant received KRW 10 million from the injured party, and delivered it to H Co., Ltd. among them, and the remaining KRW 40 million was thought to be used for the personal purpose of the Defendant, such as selling expenses, and at the time, the Defendant was in the personal debt of KRW 20 million, while the Defendant did not have any property under a separate fixed income or the name of the Defendant, and thus, he/she is obliged to repay it even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party.

arrow