All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because each sentence (Defendant B: imprisonment with prison labor for four months, Defendant E: imprisonment for eight months, and confiscation) declared by the court below to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendants led to the confession of the crime of this case (the confessions made by the defendant E in the first instance) and reflects the fact that the defendant Eul is suffering from the right-hand disorder, etc. However, the defendant Eul has a record of punishment three times of the same crime (two times of fine and one time of imprisonment). The defendant Eul was sentenced to punishment for fraud (eight months of imprisonment), and the defendant Eul committed each of the crimes of this case without being able to do so during the period of repeated crime after being released, and the crime of fraud of this case committed by the defendant Eul was committed using a wood card and a special siren. The crime of fraud of this case seems to have been committed with expertise, intelligence, and the quality of the crime is poor; the defendant Eul was punished once (one time of fine) due to gambling disorder; the defendant Eul appears to have an gambling character for the defendants; the defendant Eul was unable to reach an agreement on the victim's age and family relation; the defendant Eul did not appear to have reached all the following circumstances; the defendant's argument that the defendant Eul committed the crime of this case of this case;

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.