A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 12, 2016, the Defendant had a dispute over the issue of taxi driver D and taxi driver in front of the Seocho-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on August 12, 2016, and the Defendant heard that “The Defendant and the taxi engineer are working for the taxi at the city,” upon receiving a report from 112, paid the taxi expenses and returned back to the site from the F slope belonging to the Ethal of the Seoul Special Police Station Ethical Station Ethal of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City to the site.”

"In doing the bath theory, the hand floor of F is cleeped once with the left side of the F, and the part of the left part of the knife was removed with the hand knife with the hand hack.

The defendant was arrested by the assistant F as a flagrant offender of the crime of interference with the performance of official duties from the assistant F, and was loaded to the patrol vehicle, and was escorted to the police station E district of the former So-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Police Station G in the Jeonjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

At around 04:14 of the same day, the Defendant took a bath at the entrance of the above E zone, stating, “Isk new son, dead, dead, and discarded,” on the ground that he does not want to enter the zone and undergo an investigation, and asked H’s title one time to stop from H in the E zone belonging to the E zone belonging to the E zone belonging to the Seo-gu Police Station in Seoul Special Metropolitan City. On the same day, the Defendant opened the E zone at around 04:20 of the same day, stating, “Is belonging to the E zone belonging to the former E zone in the former E zone, who was under surveillance of the Defendant in the above E zone, without any special reason, and was able to carry a portable phone cited in his hand.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers F, H, and I concerning the handling of the reported case by F, I, and the victim F, and the victim F, the victim F, the victim H, the victim H, and the victim I, on the face of a pedago that requires approximately two weeks of treatment, the victim H, and the victim I, on the face of a pedago that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D, H, I, and F;

1. Application of each injury diagnosis certificate, each damaged part photograph, and CCTV video-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The corresponding criminal provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of crime; and