beta
Text
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the sentence imposed by the court below (a prison term of three years, a suspended sentence of five years, and a surcharge of 135.6 million won) is too uneased and unreasonable.
2. Examining the various sentencing conditions in the instant case, each of the instant offenses is committed in collusion with B, C, and D, who are co-offenders, with respect to the lease and non-purchase of state forests, and the amount received is KRW 267,50,000,000,000,000,000 won acquired by the Defendant is large to KRW 135,60,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
However, all of the crimes of this case committed each of the crimes of this case, including the fact that the defendant was committed at the time of the commission of each of the crimes of this case, there are no criminal records and criminal records of the same kind exceeding the fine, the network N intended to directly make a solicitation to public officials, and the defendant finally received the solicitation solicitation expenses received by the defendant, etc., and the defendant appears to have been actively involved in the crime of this case. The defendant was deemed to have been actively involved in the act of relatively auxiliaryly taking the role compared to N. The defendant deposited KRW 10 million for a single-person P among the money providers, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character, character, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, degree of participation, means and result of the crime, etc., it is recognized that the punishment of the defendant committed by the court below is within the proper scope of punishment in accordance with the defendant's responsibility for the crime of this case.
Therefore, there is no ground for appeal by the prosecutor disputing unfair sentencing.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is justified.