1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded each comprehensive automobile insurance contract with C as the insured with respect to D vehicles owned by C (hereinafter “Defendant”), with respect to D vehicles owned by C (hereinafter “Defendant”) as the insured.

B. At around 21:20 on November 25, 2013, E was driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle to the Scarlass hotel in the direction of the city hotel in which Jeju city is linked, and the Defendant’s vehicle, at the Gwon parking lot located in the Jeju city F, has obstructed the front part of the driver’s seat in front of the Plaintiff’s driver’s seat in front of the right part while driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle in front of the right part.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

As an insurer of the foregoing insurance contract, the Plaintiff paid KRW 2,030,000 at the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle destroyed by the instant accident on December 5, 2013.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry and video of Gap evidence 1 to 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. 1) In full view of the facts acknowledged as above and the evidence adopted earlier, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was driven along the normal direction. However, in light of all the circumstances such as the occurrence of the instant accident, it is reasonable to deem the instant accident to have occurred due to the negligence of Defendant’s driver’s duty of front-time watch and breach of the duty of prohibition of central collision. 2) In comparison with the width of the instant accident site and the specifications of the Plaintiff’s vehicle parked on the road that is parked on the right side of the direction of the vehicle and the direction of the Plaintiff’s driving, the instant accident is entirely attributable to the negligence of the center failure of the Plaintiff’s median line, since it is apparent that the Defendant driven the center line when comparing the size of the instant accident site with those of the vehicle parked on the road that is parked on the side of the direction of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the direction of the Plaintiff’s driving.