1. At around 22:43 on April 11, 2014, in the street near the intersection of the Geumcheon Teachers' Road located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Geumcheon-gu.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to the Plaintiff’s private taxi (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) owned by E and E during the contract period from November 20, 2013 to November 24:00 on to November 20, 2014.

B. On April 11, 2014, the Defendant driven a non-registered Oral Ba owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Oral Ba”), and proceeds from a pande of the air route located in the city of Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, to a erode of the horse shooting distance from the erode of the city of Myanmar. On the other hand, the Defendant changed the course from the two-lane to the four-lanes after the signal signal of the direction was changed to the green light.

At the time, E runs along the same room as the Defendant, four-lanes of the four-lanes, and the Defendant, who changed the course to four-lanes, caused a traffic accident as stated in Paragraph 1 of the Disposition (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”) by shocking the part of the Defendant’s right edges on the left side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle into the part of the upper part.

다. 이로 인하여 피고는 바닥에 쓰러져 안쪽 복사의 골절, 우측발의 으깸손상, 리스프랑씨 관절 탈구 및 골절, 우측 종족골 골절 등의 상해를 입었다. 라.

On June 18, 2014, the Defendant received a disposition of non-prosecution of indictment suspension in the criminal case resulting from the instant traffic accident.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including each number), the viewing result of Gap evidence No. 5 (dynamic image), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether liability for damages arises;

A. The plaintiff asserts that the traffic accident in this case occurred as a result of the plaintiff's negligence without checking whether the defendant, who was in the two lanes, had no driving vehicles in the three and four lanes, and the traffic accident in this case occurred rapidly by changing the course to the four lanes, and the plaintiff's vehicle has no liability for damages due to no negligence.

As to this, the defendant.