logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2021.03.05 2019가단134732
대여금
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 110,00,000, and KRW 84,000,000 to Plaintiff B, Defendant C’s respective money from September 26, 2019.

Reasons

Judgment on the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant C - Indication of claims: as shown in the reasons for the claims in the attached Form.

- Grounds for Recognition: Judgment by publication service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act) that Plaintiff A’s claim against Defendant D was jointly and severally guaranteed by Defendant D’s debt of KRW 110 million against Defendant C, but the evidence submitted by the said Plaintiff is insufficient to recognize the fact of joint and several surety by itself, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff A's claim against the defendant D cannot be accepted.

3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff Eul's claims and the plaintiff Eul's claims against the defendant Eul are reasonable, and they are accepted. The plaintiff Eul's claims against the defendant Eul are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow