A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From around 2013, the Defendant is a person who has been engaged in a medium and high-level computer trading business, etc. in his/her own residence, 2501, 1102 apartment B-gu, Young-si, 2501.

On December 2, 2013, at around 21:00, the Defendant acquired stolen goods from F in total at KRW 70,000,000, after being aware of the fact that the price of Nowon-gu 1,50,000, the market price of the victim G that he stolen from F, from F, after purchasing stolen goods at KRW 1.5 million, from May 16, 2017, the Defendant acquired stolen goods from F in total at KRW 37,1350,00,000, total market price of the stolen goods at KRW 3,1355,00,000, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each investigation report (related to the phone call details by a suspect A who is a F crime, and related to attaching CDs to suspect A’s phone call details);

1. Arrangement of the details of sending the station of AKT excursion ship during a crime committed in F, and the details of call call of A (H) KT (excursion ship);

1. Copies of the records on each part of the F (No. 1, 2, 3)

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statute to storage CDs with the victim's AC content;

1. Relevant Article 362 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (The following reasons for sentencing) of the Criminal Act (the sentencing shall be considered in favor of the defendant) / [the scope of the recommendation / [the scope of the punishment ] the basic area (from June to January 1) of the type 1 (the stolens against the general stolens) (no person subject to special sentencing] : The scope of the comparison between the sentencing and the recommended sentence: From June to January 6 [the sentence] - The sentence was sentenced] - The sentence was committed repeatedly and once for the same offense committed against the defendant. - The normal circumstances favorable to the defendant are recognized, and there are no special objections that are against the law. Family members, including minor children, will support them.