(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.25 2016가합72835

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.25 2016가합72835

당선무효 확인

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The passage of the election of the chief of the branch of this case 1) E, an incorporated association (hereinafter “E”).

The defendant, a non-corporate company under its jurisdiction, is an election for the president of the branch office of this case (hereinafter “election for the president of the branch office of this case”) at the 48th regular meeting, which will be held April 22, 2013.

The above election was conducted. According to the enforcement rules of the E articles of association and the election management regulations, the above election was conducted. (2) According to the Plaintiff, D, and C. 2), according to the E articles of association and the E articles of association, the resolutions were made to grant election rights to representatives on April 13, 2013, on the condition that the Plaintiff, D, and C, and C, a joint meeting with the Defendant Election Commission (hereinafter referred to as the “National Election Commission”) will not be withdrawn even if they were to be withdrawn.

3) On April 15, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a petition with D through F, the head of the election countermeasure headquarters. From March 21, 2013 to the head of the Si/Gun/Gu affiliated with the Defendant, the Plaintiff filed an objection against D, asserting that he/she disseminated money and valuables to the head of the Si/Gun/Gu affiliated with the Defendant. On April 16, 2013, E transferred the said petition to the captain, and on April 19, 2013, the first instance court decided that D cannot be deemed to have violated the election regulations because of lack of confirmation and lack of evidential materials. As a result of the deliberation on April 19, 2013, the Plaintiff raised an objection against D’s review on April 20, 2013, but the first instance court decided that D’s total number of votes obtained by the Plaintiff’s 25th of the election campaign chairperson [4th of the instant 20th of the number of votes obtained by the Defendant’s 25th of the voting president.

5 D On April 23, 2013, a petition for an election that contests the validity of the election of the president of the branch on the election day.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2014.11.18 2013가합22778

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.10 2015가합530831

-수원지방법원 2014.11.18 2014가합4777

-서울서부지방법원 2017.06.22 2016가합35895

-전주지방법원 2020.04.09 2019가합2086