A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of ten months and a fine of seven million won.

When the defendant does not pay a fine.

Criminal facts

The defendant from February 9, 2016 to the same year.

6. Until March 3, 198, the Defendant’s 18,452km of heavy-domestic carpers in the Seo-gu D market in Gwangju-gu sold 160,530,000 won per kilogramg average of 8,700 won per piece of plastic bags indicated as “domestic acid,” and stored the large number of domestic carpers in seven plastic bags of 10 km capacity indicated as “domestic acid,” and the large number of Korean carpers in 70 km and the large number of domestic carpers in 1,928 km mixed with the large number of domestic carpers in 7:3 7:0 km and sold the large number of carpers per kilogramg as average of 8,700,000 won per piece of plastic bags, and divided it into 16,70,000 g of large volume per 30 g of Korean vinyl and divided it into 130 g of large volume per 1.

Accordingly, the Defendant made a false indication of the origin of agricultural products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. On-site photographs;

1. An investigation report (the time of false indication of origin and sales ratio);

1. Investigative report (the details of sales on a large scale of motor vehicles);

1. Application of investigation reports (verification of false labelling quantities on the one hand in the Republic of Korea) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 14 and Article 6 (1) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Imprisonment and fine concurrently with respect to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of a punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of community service order - The crime of this case is due to the violation of the consumer's trust on the indication of origin and the harm of sound distribution order. The crime of this case is due to the absence of responsibility for infringing the consumer's trust on the indication of origin - the defendant's illegal gains obtained by deceiving the country of origin - on the other hand, and there is no punishment force due to the same act as this case - the defendant did not purchase a large number of imported products, after the occurrence of the crime.