Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of 1,500,000 won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On July 14, 2013, around 02:45, in the state of under the influence of alcohol of approximately 2 kilometers from the street on the front of a cafeteria in front of the municipal ordinance-dong to the influence tunnel, which is located in the Yancheon-si, the CNS car volume, while under the influence of alcohol of about 0.070% (Smoking measurement) of blood alcohol content.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting the circumstances of running a driving house;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, which choose the penalty for the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Summary of the facts charged against Defendant A

A. On July 14, 2013, Defendant A in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases”), driving a Dropian car volume on July 14, 2013, and driving a two-lane road of about 50 meters in a winter-dong in the net city at a speed of about 60 kilometers a speed from the east of the Municipal Ordinance to the ebbbbbrence of a speed of about 50 kilometers.

A two-lane has changed into a two-lane.

In this case, there was a duty of care to inform the direction change in advance and to change the lanes safely by taking into account the traffic situation of the front and rear left.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and changed the two-lanes into the two-lanes, thereby getting the front part of the vehicle of the B driver's car in the same direction as the other part of the B driver's car in the same direction.

Therefore, the above occupational negligence suffered injury, such as catitis, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, to B.

B. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act damaged the repair cost of KRW 19,524,016 at the same time and place as the above paragraph (a).

2. This part of the facts charged is subject to Article 3(1) and (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.