logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.10.23 2013고단1513
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 19, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. in the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch for the crime of interference with business, etc. on August 19, 201, and was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. at the Suwon District Court on February 9, 2012 and sentenced to three million won of a fine at the Suwon District Court on April 13, 2012, which became final and conclusive on April 13, 2012, and the sentence of the above suspension of execution becomes invalidated, and appears to be “ March 11, 2013.” However, the charges appear to be “Article 47 of the Investigation Record” as “Article 47 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and there is no concern that the Defendant’s exercise of his/her defense right may not be any substantial disadvantage.” Thus, the Defendant’s amendment procedures are deemed to be

The execution of each of the above imprisonment in the Ansan prison was completed.

1. To revise part of the facts charged without going through amendments to indictment to the extent that it is deemed that there is no concern about substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his right of defense;

On September 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 17:30 on September 28, 2013, 17:30, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the event preparation personnel in front of the outdoor performance hall of the out-of-door Hodong Hodong-dong, and (c) scambling them; (b) 3 times, she was suffering from her sexual organ, produced it, and

2. On October 2, 2013, from around 01:30 to around 02:15, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main shop business by force for about 40 minutes, such as “a two-year, chewing, and a funeral service refusal,” and “a two-year, chewing, and a funeral service refusal,” and the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main shop business by force.

3. To revise and supplement part of the facts charged without following changes in indictment to the extent that it is deemed that there is no concern about substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense;

The defendant on March 2013

arrow