logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.14 2016나77261
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A.1) D and E were not qualified as licensed real estate agents, and there was no intent or ability to sell apartment units in the name of B and 2 new cities, and there was no intention or ability to return the investment money. However, it was intended to raise funds necessary for the public auction of the G case on the cost of living and the payment of debts to the existing investors, and the amount of money necessary for the public auction of 889m2, 300,000 won in the name of B and 500,000 won in the name of B and 200,000 won in the name of B and 3.50,000 won in the name of B and 3.50,000 won in the name of B and 3.50,000 won in the name of B and 13.50,000 won in the name of B and 13.50,000 won in the name of B and 13,03,000 won in the name of B and 13,03,01,03,04,00,00.

B. E is a bank account in the name of the Defendants, one’s own children.

arrow