beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and April, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of four months.
However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A discontinued-si H Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of manufacturing printed circuit board, etc. in Ansan-si G (Seoul-si) was closed on April 16, 2015.
The operator was the operator of H (hereinafter referred to as “H”).
On November 21, 2012, Defendant A entered into a lease agreement with the victim Samsung Card Co., Ltd. and the victim-owned Kwikwikset-type F&Pex (AH10-SP) at the H office at KRW 40 million, and embezzled the said machinery by arbitrarily selling the said machinery to the non-resident on June 201, 2014, while keeping the said machinery for the victim upon delivery from the injured party under the agreement.
Defendant A of the 2016 Highest 2135, around October 2, 2013, the victim J, who is the representative of the business partner I (hereinafter “I”) that demanded the repayment of the existing amount of supply of goods at the joint office of Ansan-si, the members of Ansan-si, Seoul-si, Seoul-si, to pay the purchase price to the victim J, who is the representative of the business partner I (hereinafter “I”) that demanded the repayment of the amount of supply of goods equivalent to KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000.
Machines made it possible to pay the price as if they would normally be paid if they receive materials from I, such as "the goods owned by the company that were stamped and purchased."
However, as above, the Defendant merely used the Samsung Card Co., Ltd. for the purpose of leasing from HHP16-6Sp, 1310202, 1310203 (HYDAL PRES model: HHP 16-6Sp, 13102, and 1310203) that the Defendant offered as security was removed from the Defendant’s statement that the Defendant was the Samsung Card Co., Ltd. and the Defendant was an owner of Samsung Card Co., Ltd., but the Defendant was removed from the Defendant’s statement that the Defendant was the owner of Samsung Card Co., Ltd., and the Defendant was the owner of Samsung Card Co., Ltd., and at the time the Defendant was removed from the Defendant’s external credit debt amounted to KRW 50 million, while the business performance amount increased due to improvement.