beta
Text
Defendant
A A The fines of KRW 2 million, the fines of KRW 1,00,000, the fines of KRW 1,000,000, and the fines of KRW 7,000,00.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who works as the head of the management office of Hanam-si from June 1, 2010 and has been delegated by the council of occupants' representatives to take overall charge of the management and operation of apartment, Defendant B is a person who works as the head of the management office of the above management office, Defendant C is a person who works as the head of the management office of the above management office, and Defendant D is a representative of I of the water-management and execution business chain.
1. Defendant A, B, and C’s co-principal Defendants were issued KRW 80,00,00 to the Nonghyup Bank account (K) account in the name of J around July 2012 by the H apartment management office in Hanam-si, Hanam-si, the representative D of the K Water-Management and Construction Business chain I, who continuously changed the contract of water leakage construction.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to handle another person's business and received 80,000 won in exchange for an illegal solicitation in connection with their duties.
2. Defendant A and B’s co-principal Defendants were written in the indictment around February 28, 2012, at the H apartment management office atHanam-si, Hanam-si, Hahnam-si, and the representative D of YI, “in compliance with an unlawful solicitation to the effect that they continuously change the contract for water leakage construction,” and the indictment was written around February 28, 2012, but it appears to be a clerical error in the indictment around February 28, 2012.
Defendant
Around September 27, 2012, 300,000 won was transferred to the NongHyup Bank (L) account in the name of B, and one million won was transferred to the NongHyup Bank account in the name of Defendant B.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to handle another person's business and received 1.3 million won in exchange for an illegal solicitation in connection with their duties.
3. Defendant A and C’s co-principal defendants are subject to illegal solicitation from the H Apartment Management Office around March 2012, Hanam-si, H apartment management and construction business chain I’s representative D to the effect that “a continuous request for water leakage construction contract is made.” Defendant C is from D at the H Apartment Management Office around that time.