A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. 도로교통법위반(음주운전) 피고인은 2013. 9. 25. 00:10경 인천 남동구 구월동에 있는 밴댕이골목 내 노상에서부터 인천 남구 학익동 587 로리아실리카 앞 노상까지 약 6km 구간에서 혈중알콜농도 0.193%의 술에 취한 상태로 C 싼타페 승용차를 운전하였다.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those engaged in driving motor vehicles with C highest motor vehicles.

On September 25, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol of 0.193% with blood alcohol concentration around 00:10 on September 25, 2013, and proceeded at a speed of three-lanes between the three-lanes in the direction of the Cheongjin-gun Office, Nam-gu, Incheon, in the direction of the school-based 1-dong 587 Liberia, at which it is impossible to identify the three-lanes in the direction of the school-based

At that time, there was a vehicle waiting for signal at night, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the steering gear, brakes, other devices, etc. of the vehicle, while living in the front right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the part of the victim D (E) trop (E) motor vehicle from the front part of the victim D (E) due to the negligence of the Defendant who was under the influence of alcohol as it is. The front part of the said Aropur, which was the part of the victim F.F. (G) in the front part of the said Aropurur, led the Defendant to have the part of the latter part of the victim F.F. (G) in the signal signal at the front.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, inflicted an injury on the victim H(the age of 45) on the cloud salt, etc. requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment on the part of the above victim D, and inflicted an injury on the cloud salt and tension requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment on the part of the victim H(the age of 45). In addition, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the cloud salt that requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment on the part of the above victim F.