Text
1. The plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange in the trial is dismissed.
2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. 1) The Party B Co., Ltd. is a building C and D located around May 2006 (hereinafter “instant building”).
(2) On May 18, 2006, on behalf of the sectional owners of the instant building, the management consignment agreement was concluded with the Plaintiff on behalf of the Plaintiff, and the said agreement included the content that the unpaid amount should be settled and paid to the Plaintiff when there is any unpaid amount among the management expenses imposed by the Plaintiff at the time of the termination of the contract. (2) After the approval of the shopping district council organized by the representative of F, the Plaintiff managed the instant building in accordance with the management consignment agreement.
3) On May 29, 2006, the Defendant indicated in the attached Table 1 among the instant buildings (hereinafter “instant 104 stores”).
(3) A store listed in the separate sheet 2 (hereinafter referred to as “instant 204 store”)
B) Each of the sectional owners who completed the registration of ownership transfer regarding the instant building is the one having completed each registration of ownership transfer. (B) However, since the management body was held at the general meeting of the management body on October 201, 201, the management body of E (hereinafter “the instant management body”) had the occupants pay the management expenses directly by opening an account in its name on November 201, and the Plaintiff temporarily suspended the management of the instant building on December 1, 201.
2) However, from around December 201 to February 2012, the Plaintiff imposed management fees on each sectionally owned building by calculating only expenses, such as expenses incurred in managing the instant building, such as personnel expenses for electric inspection, electricity maintenance expenses, elevator maintenance expenses, fire-fighting inspection expenses, and expenses for disinfection and disinfection as the item of management expenses, as well as public utility charges, such as electricity and water charges. 3) After then, the instant management body expressed its intent to terminate the management consignment agreement with the Plaintiff on February 15, 2012, and thereafter, the Plaintiff consented to the termination of the management consignment agreement with the Plaintiff. Since then, EN Asset Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “EN Asset Management”) was designated as a new truster around April 2012.