beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in this court while filing an appeal for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the already asserted facts in the court of first instance. Even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance were to examine each of the descriptions of evidence Nos. 30 through 34 (including the numbers of evidence No. 32) newly submitted to this court, the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's assertion is justified.
Therefore, the reasoning for the judgment of the court concerning this case is as follows, in addition to revising part of the column for the reasoning for the judgment of the court of the first instance as stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning for the judgment of the court of the first instance is as stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act
2. Parts to be corrected;
A. The court below 7th 6th 6th 6th 6th son of the judgment of the court of first instance seems to have "....." The assistance in the harmonization of this case is not against the will of the president of the union, but at least 10th 6th son's constructive intent. In light of the size of the branch office in which the intervenor takes charge, D and their family members, etc., it is difficult to view that the intervenor's request for assistance in the harmonization of this case was an exceptional situation. In light of the intervenor's involvement in the harmonization of this case and the situation of the intervenor's attitude before and after delivering a photograph file to H, it seems that the intervenor did not have known that its purpose was unfair at the time of photographing. In addition to the harmonization of this case under the name of the president of NFF, the possibility that the intervenor merely made a request by the president of the union, regardless of the election of the president of the union, and the intervenor planned or planned to conduct the election campaign in collusion with the president of the union.