All judgment of the court below shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for 2 years and 6 months, and 8 months) of the original judgment (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for 2 years and 2 months), is too unreasonable.

2. The court of the trial ex officio rendered a decision to jointly examine each of the appeals cases against the defendant by the court below.

The judgment of the court below, in relation to concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, should simultaneously be sentenced to a single punishment within the scope of punishment for aggravated concurrent crimes pursuant to Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act.

Therefore, all judgment of the court below cannot be maintained.

3. The judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, without examining the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing, and the judgment below is reversed in its entirety, and it is again decided as follows.

Criminal facts

The summary of facts constituting an offense and evidence recognized by this court shall be as shown in the respective columns of the original judgment.

Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act is quoted as it is.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act, as to the facts of the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (mutual between crimes of uttering of respective investigative documents on June 5, 2014 and between crimes of uttering of respective investigative documents on April 29, 2014) of the same Act, each of the following crimes:

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes (as to each crime listed in Nos. 1 through 8 of the List of Crimes attached to the judgment below, and each crime except for the crime of fraud committed on May 30, 2013 against victims S)

1. Among concurrent offenders, the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant has a deep depth and reflects his/her mistake, and that the defendant supports his/her parents and two children, etc.