1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. In the first instance court’s trial scope, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for the transfer of ownership, the transfer of land, and the return of unjust enrichment as the principal lawsuit, and the Defendant filed a claim for the transfer of ownership as a counterclaim, and the first instance court dismissed both the Plaintiff’s principal lawsuit and the Defendant’s counterclaim.

In this regard, the plaintiff only appealed on the part of the claim for ownership transfer registration during the principal lawsuit, and the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the part of the claim for ownership transfer registration.

2. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: "1, 12, 3, 14, and 15" in the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance as well as "1, 12, 13, 14, and 15" in the third sentence as "1, 12, 13, 14, and 15" in the fourth sentence, and "I, in the sixth sentence as "I, in part of M forest after the fact," "I, in part of E forest after the fact," and on the sixth part, "at present, while the plaintiff occupies it" in the sixth sentence as "at present, while the defendant occupies it," and therefore, it is identical to the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.