1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion, the Defendant, and D, and the establishment of a new child care center of 130 children in accordance with the plan to authorize the establishment of a new child care center of the Sungnam-gu Office (hereinafter “instant child care center”). 2) The Plaintiff bears various expenses, such as purchase of the building for the establishment of the instant child care center and the construction of the interior, and the Defendant qualified as the president is to perform the duties of the representative and the principal of the instant child care center and contribute to work as the management teacher. 3) The Plaintiff has a right to operating the instant child care center and pays a certain amount of wages to the Defendant. 4) The Defendant concluded a non-exclusive contract with the head of the instant administrative agency to take charge of all affairs, including submission of documents related to the authorization of the child care center.

On May 3, 2013, the Defendant prepared and submitted an application for counseling prior to the establishment of a child-care center in Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul, and received a public notice from the Jung-gu Office on June 3, 2013 that the Defendant was selected as a counseling subject prior to the establishment of a new child-care center and that the Defendant shall meet the installation standards until December 10, 2013 and complete the application for new authorization of a child-care center.

On December 10, 2013, the defendant changed the representative and the president, or demanded the monthly salary of 5 million won, and submitted to the public official in charge the promise to apply for the extension of the period of application for new authorization to the Jung-gu Office on December 10, 2013, and submitted to the public official in charge the withdrawal source to waive the status of the person subject to new authorization.

As a result, the Plaintiff was unable to operate the childcare center of this case due to its failure to obtain authorization of the childcare center of this case, and eventually, the Plaintiff is operating a childcare center of 26 members from the underground floor, the first floor, and the second floor of the building for the operation of the childcare center of this case, and the remaining 3,4, and 5 floors

Therefore, the defendant is above.