beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Facts of recognition
On December 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendants were professors in the English and English language of L University.
The Defendants, in consultation with each other, written the same text as the attached Form (hereinafter referred to as “instant publication”). Defendant J, upon delegation from other Defendants, published the said text on December 15, 2012, on the bulletin board of the internal communication network available for perusal by professors affiliated with the humanities College.
【In the absence of dispute, the Plaintiff asserted the purport of Gap evidence No. 3, and the entire argument, and the Plaintiff sought compensation for mental damage resulting therefrom, among the contents of the Notice No. 3, that the Plaintiff committed violent speech to other professors in English, and that the operation of the department was interfered with. As such, the Plaintiff did not continue to engage in violent speech to the Defendants. Thus, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff’s reputation was damaged due to the Notice No. 3, and that the Plaintiff sought compensation for mental damage.
As to this, the Defendants asserted that the content of this case’s notice is not false because the Defendants expressed the fact that they were frighted while working together with the Plaintiff, and it is not false, and that there is a defect that intends to adopt a resolution at the point of view of infringement of the right of education regarding the transfer measures to the basic education center for the Plaintiff at that time, and that the Defendants posted the instant notice in order to clarify the position of English English language, and thus, the illegality is excluded as it is for the public interest of the English English
Judgment
In the event that the plaintiff impairs another person's reputation by stating the facts, when the plaintiff seeks damages by claiming that the alleged facts are false or false evaluation as the cause of the claim, the burden of proof of the falsity exists on the plaintiff, but the defendant's alleged facts are true.