A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 9, 2007, the defendant was found to have been punished by a fine of 500,000 won by a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on July 9, 2007, and 3 million won by a fine at the same court on May 14, 2013.

On August 8, 2014, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at 0.062% of blood alcohol level, driven Bsch Rexn car at approximately KRW 700 meters from the front of a new apartment in front of the new apartment in the Nam-gu Nam-dong, Nam-gu, Gwangju, to the front of the national funeral hall located in the same Gu-dong, from around 700 meters to the front of the national funeral hall.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the situation of a drinking driver, inquiry into the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, and a statement of control details;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. For the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the positive factors to determine the sentence like the ordering considering the motive, background, means and methods of the crime of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, career and environment as shown in the oral argument of this case: There is no criminal record of probation or higher, and there is no negative factor that there is no criminal record of the same kind of crime except the criminal record of this case: One year has passed again even if a summary order was issued due to drunk driving as shown in the judgment: