Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the business of driving a BLPHAS REAM bicycle in the exhaust displacement of 124cc.

On August 22, 2020, the Defendant driven a bicycle with a motor device at around 12:55 on August 22, 2020, and continued to drive the tri-distance intersection in front of Ulsan-gu C at the seat of the D High School, leading directly to a private distance slope.

Since there is a three-distance intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform the above duty of care and neglected to keep the above crosssection from the offline of E apartment complex to the left-hand turn from the off surface of D high school, and received the front part of G K5 car running in the south, 31 years old, from the right side of the bicycle of the Defendant’s operation.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer injury, such as salt, tensions, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the F’s written statements related to traffic accidents to photographs, field photographs, and diagnostic records after capturing the booms images of the victim;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is not somewhat weak to the degree of violation of the defendant's duty of care due to the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the majority of the defendant who has been punished due to non-licenseless driving or drinking driving in the past, seems to lack of self-sufficiency to comply with traffic regulations, on the other hand, the defendant did not agree with the victim, and there is no history of punishment exceeding the fine, and the degree of injury of the victim is relatively much more severe