beta
Text
Defendant
A and B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Defendant
A and B, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 6, 2015, the Defendants rendered an appraisal on the grounds that the conduct of the Victim G(25 years of age) who had drinking alcohol at the “F” point in T on March 6, 2015, when drinking alcohol, and drinking alcohol at another table table, was slicked.
Around that time, when Defendant D's daily activities have come out of the main point in order to smoke tobacco, there was a dispute on the ground that the victim who was able to enter the main point and the snow were dried and changed each other.
Defendant
C is said that there is a dispute as above.
C. The Defendant A and Defendant B expressed the victim’s desire to “I am, so far as I am,” and expressed that “I am, I am soon,” and pushed the victim’s head with scams and head by hand, and pushed the victim’s scam by hand, and continued to blicker in the main room, and threaten the victim’s head with the hand floor.
As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted bodily injury on the victim in detail, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. The police statement concerning G;
1. Each statement of H and I;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the victim's body photograph and the injury diagnosis report;
1. Relevant Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 2 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. (Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Criminal Crimes, and Article 257 (1)
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (Defendant A and B);
1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the defendant A and B) is favorable to the defendant, and the defendant again committed the crime of this case despite the fact that the defendant had been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and the defendant was not subject to the law of the number of crimes, and the period of suspension of execution.