1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the addition of the following '2. Additional Judgment' as to the assertion that the plaintiff emphasizes or added in this court, and thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. The Plaintiff asserts that, after having decided to transfer the instant goods to the Plaintiff’s East F, the Plaintiff was paid in installments from F. In light of these circumstances, the Plaintiff is currently aware that the Plaintiff is the owner of the instant goods.

According to Gap evidence Nos. 7 and 9, the fact that F remitted total of KRW 6,276,00 to the plaintiff from March 11, 2016 to May 10, 2017 is recognized.

However, as shown in the above argument by the Plaintiff, it is difficult to believe that the evidence No. 8, which seems consistent with the above argument by the Plaintiff, was, and the remaining evidence alone, was transferred to F.

Of the money remitted by F to the Plaintiff as alleged by the Plaintiff, it is insufficient to recognize at will a certain amount of KRW 3,026,000 as the purchase price for the instant goods, and there is no evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals against the Defendants by the Plaintiff are dismissed.