The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (five million won in penalty) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The instant crime was committed by the Defendant, at the home where the Defendant was living together with his mother who is the victim, breathing the breath of the breath of the breath by leaving the 8th window of the glass, and thereby damaging the victim E and F-owned vehicles in the process, and the details and methods of the crime are very dangerous, poor, and worn down.

Furthermore, the Defendant was a number of violent crimes, and was under suspension of execution due to violent crimes at the time of the instant crime.

Therefore, it is necessary to be subject to strict punishment corresponding to the crime committed by the defendant against the defendant.

However, the defendant does not repeat the crime again.

In light of the fact that there is a reflective appearance, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victims including the mother's parents and that the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant, and in full view of the conditions of the sentencing as shown in the arguments in the present case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment imposed by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.